Monday, 7 October 2013

Extended Post: Kicking the Beyhive





 In my desperation to maintain my Beekeeping theme, and with the helpful suggestion of fellow ALC215 student India, I have been closely examining for this extended blog “Queen B” Beyonce and applying ideas of celebrity culture to her. (close enough right?) After initially only tentatively looking into the Beyhive to stick on theme it has actually stirred up the hive to the point where the boggling fame of Beyonce sprawled so far online it is surprisingly hard to take in and to summarise.

The buzz of the “Beyhive” online is deafening with millions of fans all thirsting for the already abundant content. Like a bee collecting honey there is no end to the work of collecting and consuming beyond abundance. For me it is hard to understand why but perhaps like the bee there is a small effort by each which an effort in unison to support one “queen” results in an amazing beautiful cooperation that can be seen as all involved benefitting from. Or alternatively it could be seen as an exploitative system where the efforts of the bee/fan and queen/Beyonce are robbed from to support the maintenance of highly managed oppressive system. Clashing interpretations in the same way ideas of globalisation are debated.

Beyonce, who topped the Forbes list of top earning celebrity couples last year with husband Jay-Z, projects a public and private image that is globally recognisable. I will be using Beyonce's various social media accounts to look at her complex online presentation as a case study with regards to the work of David Marshall (2010) and his concept of the "Specular Economy", a way of interpreting celebrity culture and social media. Beyonce's 'Beyhive Blog' which is produced apparently according by Queen Bey herself as:

"MY WAY OF SHOWING ALL THE INSPIRING THINGS
I COME ACROSS EVERY SINGLE DAY.
THIS IS THROUGH MY EYES."

This involves a transformation of identity of both Beyonce Knowles the singer and her fans into a Queen and her Beys, a modification of identity in line with what Marshal (2013) discusses: “the public/private/intimate of celebrity discourse – have moved through our culture quite dramatically beyond a system of representative individuals to an expansive new presentation of the self.” (2013, pg. 6) The celebrity discourse within the public yet intimate online hub of Beyonce’s Beyhive has shifted to an inclusive active hive where personas and presentations of the self are heightened according to a theme of a beehive not just for the celebrity but for the fans too.

Beyonces plays upon words such as buzz, pollen and sting, usually in reference to a bee, as slang terms for stalking, information and defence. The “golden rule” of the Beyhive as explained by Beyonce herself in an older post:

“We protect our own. We are all beautiful. One Bey should never turn on another. We defend each other. Let love & respect guide you and always be good to each other. Follow the golden rule Beys!”
This hybrid of identity and values outlaid as the golden rule of the Beyhive is a transformational sentiment that is inclusive and moves from simple celebrity culture worship to a way to live your life in and away from the Beyhive cooperatively.  

The framework of the Beyhive allows for organisation of information and forms of production of media in a globally co-operative fashion what Marshall describes as “intercommunication” (2013, pg. 9) a flow of presentational media produced and serviced by individuals enabled by what can be summarised as social media tools such as tumblr, instagram, youtube, twitter and facebook to service what Marshall describes as a “micropublic” (2013, pg. 12).

Beys feel privy to the interpersonal messages of Beyonce the individual forming a bond that is felt as a greater connection than possible between a traditional fan and Beyonces public persona through her “online doppelganger” (2013, pg. 12). This building of a more controlled micropublic around Beyonce’s public presentation seems to me is a much more structured discursive environment with the illusion of private access. There is no controversial ramblings of the inner thoughts of Beyonce Knowles, the Beyhive is a very polished and managed micropublic that must be edited and screened produced by promotional elements rather than private access to the individual.

The website takes from instagram, twitter and youtube to create a feeling, an officially endorsed emotional connection more than the personal access. The site features very little text, mainly the page design is comprised of tiles of images linking to companies and photographers pages while videos are very seldom about Beyonce herself at all and if she does feature in a video it’s only for a brief immaculate sound bite. An online shop page where calendars, fragrances and clothing are available for purchase along with vip tour tickets is also a key feature of the Beyhive.

Within the multiple networked media within the Beyhive an organic method of performative practice of content collection and distribution through performed intimacy, authenticity and access through the construction of easily consumed personas of the Queen and her Beys can be viewed, in line with what Marwick and boyd have found through analysis of twitter, as a balance of power to maintain popularity. “Through analysis of tweets from 237 highly followed Twitter users, we find that celebrity practice involves presenting a seemingly authentic, intimate image of self while meeting fan expectations and maintaining important relationships.” (2011, pg.140)

Beyonce’s  relationships with friends and employees fellow singers, stylists, choreographers and photographers are very much a part of the Beyhive too which plays an important draw for Beys to feel part of Queen Bey’s Hive. Her stylist even has her own tab on the main page of street fashion photos of fans and just well dressed people walking around. Photos of Beyonce at moments of relaxation on her tour of South America with her daughter mixed with promotional video sound bites from her side of stage about performing her new song merge the public and private popularity raising “news” items more respectfully than a gossip rag or the traditional P.R. methods could ever manage.

The Beyhive is run with many Entomological references with “wasps” being haters of Beyonce who need to be “stung” or defended by the “Beys” who are her fans. In reference to the insect, the bee, Beyonce officially dubbed the types of Beys, and the characteristics and names a fan can be. Beyonce has officially dubbed herself The Queen Bey, as the leader of the Hive who works night and day to provide "honey" (or content) for her Beys.

Fans have the option of naming themselves a type of Bey depending on which category they fall into, given the options of Honey Beys, Bumble Beys and Digger Beys. This is a process of symbolic language Marwick and boyd describe that can “provide value to their fan base and to emphasize commonalities between the practitioner and his or her followers” (2011, pg.147). It is a uniquely linked cultural symbolism that creates a lasting association to strengthen popularity.

Although twitter arguably allows for much more intimate look at celebrity than the rather closed Beyhive it seems the same practices are taking place managing fans expectations. Both are new practices very different from the traditional fan/ celebrity relationship where “celebrities” have become “celebrity practitioners” using a set of practices as Marshall (2013), Marwick and boyd describe (2011, pg. 141).

Image: Beyonce's Instagram

The reaction to Beyonce getting a shorter haircut earlier in the year prompted a staggering response. Shocked fans on social media expressed themselves venomously across all platforms after the innocuous Instagram snap was posted from her official account and intrigued media outlets ran the 'story' multiple times across the breadth of the expected gossip rags and fashion media all the way to mainstream news coverage.

Interviews with stylists, celebrities, hairdressers, fans and her personal friends contributed to the thousands of words of opinions spread across users of social media on the new look. Close analysis of her presentation over the following days built a singer's new hairdo into a media wildfire that seemingly couldn't be sated. A 23 page analysis of every different hairstyle she had over the last 10 years and 32 of InternationalBusiness Times favourite do's perhaps going the furthest to explore the follicle folly.

This seemingly democratic interactivity of new and old media scrambling to exchange opinions on the presentation of a celebrity through the seemingly personal window of the original image is a demonstration of Marshall's Specular Economy as "An entire new industry—an economy of circulating images, information, text, conversation and interpersonal exchanges—has been built to service the now more pervasive and oddly democratic construction of public identities." (2010, pg. 502) She has built up her public value and grown a "networked culture" based on her public persona through her Beyhive Blog, a more than likely closely managed front page for her Tumblr and Instagram accounts as well as various other links of her 'inspirations', trending fashions and images and videos of collective fan appreciation.

The Beyhive is buzzing with the work of her fans or 'Beys' busily "becoming part of the media ebb and flow" as Marshall describes (2010, pg. 500). Her very own realm of personal presentation produces a seemingly private and intimate discourse with all content stamped with her genuine approval. Fashion brands, restaurants, car customisation companies, upcoming tours of hers as well as other artists she chooses to promote as well as various other more subtle promotions such as maintaining the edge of her iphone 5 in focus within the above viral shot, all link the promotional with a personal touch.
Beyonce within the Beyhive has become a public personality system that is seemingly private and intimate opening the discourse for her worker Beys to consume and contribute to her success like a real queen bee in its hive cared for by it's drones and workers.



Marshall, P.D 2010, ‘The Specular Economy’, Society, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 498-502

Marwick, A, & Boyd, D 2011, 'To See and Be Seen: Celebrity Practice on Twitter', Convergence: The Journal Of Research Into New Media Technologies, 17, 2, pp. 139-158, Communication & Mass Media Complete, EBSCOhost, viewed 7 October 2013.

Marshall, P.D 2013, ‘Persona studies: Mapping the proliferation of the public self’,  Journalism, published online 2 June 2013, Sage Publications http://jou.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/05/28/1464884913488720  

No comments:

Post a Comment